On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:57:20AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:44PM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
I have a first cut of a template for cabalizing and debianizing haskell libraries.
I haven't had a good look, but I note you use dh_haskell. Personally I don't see the attraction of dh_haskell over update-haskell-control. The latter can be used to keep build-deps in sync as well as deps (and the fact that dh_haskell looks like it still incorrectly generates deps like ghc6 (<< 6.4.1-999) at least 7 months after I first talked about it with
That's because I still don't understand why your suggestion is better. But I'm sitting in a train station right now, and will have to look at this more when I get back home.
-- John